Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 153
In response to
"
did we talk about the New Yorker's final take on her campaign?
"
by
loosilu
This article? -- (link)
Posted by
colin (aka colinski)
Nov 2 '24, 15:35
(No message)
https://www.newyorker.com/news/fault-lines/the-perils-of-the-good-enough-candidate
(www.newyorker.com)
Responses:
yep -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 2, 15:39
7
Hmm. I thought it had some good points.
-
colin
Nov 2, 15:48
6
sigh
-
loosilu
Nov 2, 15:54
5
I think what we settle for is a centrist.
-
the wrong element
Nov 2, 17:31
I get it. What's wrong with wanting something more?
-
colin
Nov 2, 16:04
3
I'm slightly hopeful that two of those judges may not make it another 4 years. -- nm
-
Krusty
Nov 2, 16:12
1
But that's relying on a fair, normal process, which we cannot rely on any more (not for the past decade) -- nm
-
colin
Nov 2, 16:13
I already voted for her. Don't worry about that. -- nm
-
colin
Nov 2, 16:05
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.