ST Alpha - "If it was avoidance of credible threats of violence, I agree with the decision. -- (edited)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "“Avoidance and de-escalation” of what, exactly?" by znufrii

If it was avoidance of credible threats of violence, I agree with the decision. -- (edited)

Posted by Strongbad (aka Rambler14) Nov 12 '24, 12:22

If it was avoidance due to yard signs and MAGA flags, I 100% disagree and ask how ST would view this if the political parties were reversed.

Responses:

“Credible threat” seems a high bar for an operational risk assessment, but I think it unlikely in context that the decision was based on partisan bias - znufrii Nov 12, 12:32 2
- I agree. Leave out credible. Any threat from a property owner should be enough. - Strongbad Nov 12, 12:49 1
  - I think there’s a lot more gray area than you’re allowing, and people generally try to make the best decisions they can in the moment. -- (edited) - znufrii Nov 12, 13:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.