Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 11:48
2: Dec 2, 08:21
3: Dec 1, 17:33
4: Dec 1, 11:23
5: Nov 30, 15:54
6: Nov 30, 09:41
7: Nov 29, 16:44
8: Nov 29, 08:01
9: Nov 28, 16:19
10: Nov 28, 09:42
11: Nov 27, 18:07
12: Nov 27, 12:04
13: Nov 27, 08:26
14: Nov 26, 18:06
15: Nov 26, 12:05
16: Nov 26, 08:29
17: Nov 25, 18:33
18: Nov 25, 11:12
19: Nov 25, 07:08
20: Nov 24, 13:17
Posts: 153
In response to
"
It’s a bit of bullshit to drop a team who qualified for a title game in favor of teams not good enough to make one. -- nm
"
by
Will Hunting
Yeah, they've said they wouldn't penalize conference title losers, but I'll believe it when I see it. -- nm
Posted by
Volnelk (aka Volnelk)
Dec 2 '24, 09:18
(No message)
Responses:
If they're not penalizinig conference title losers then are SMU and Boise St getting in even if they lose? -- nm
-
Dano
Dec 2, 09:55
2
If Clemson were to lose, that's a 9-4 team in the playoffs which makes no sense. Especially in that weak conference. -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 2, 09:59
1
Right now Clemson's ranking would not put them in the playoffs as an at large team. SMU and Boise St's ranking would.
-
Dano
Dec 2, 10:12
I'm not sure that's a good approach to ignore the outcomes TBH -- nm
-
ty97
Dec 2, 09:55
1
I agree. You shouldn't be able to gain with NO possibility of loss from the game. -- nm
-
Volnelk
Dec 2, 10:00
Post a message
top
Handle:
optional — your username will be used if a handle is not provided.
Save this handle
Username:
Password:
Subject:
Message:
Link
URL:
Title:
Attachment
You must be logged in to attach images.