ST Alpha - "Why would Prop 8 go to court? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 161

In response to "Prop 8 will probably end up back in court, don't give up yet. -- nm" by Stacy

Why would Prop 8 go to court? -- nm

Posted by ty97 Nov 6 '08, 01:20

(No message)

Responses:

the short version is that it amends the state constitution but (arguably) did not meet all the procedural safeguards for that process -- nm - compound ruler-elect pigby Nov 6, 01:27 4
- Oh, technicalities. I like technicalities. -- nm - ty97 Nov 6, 01:32 3
  - Dawson posted a paraphrase this morning, a proposition cannot significantly alter the concepts of the constitution without legislative approval... - zeitgeist Nov 6, 01:45 2
    - :) -- nm - Stacy Nov 6, 02:13
    - This is great news. - ty97 Nov 6, 02:03
for a few reasons first the marriages that have already taken place should remain valid regardless of the law being switched. Second, the NO on 8 - Stacy Nov 6, 01:26 4
- I'm not sure I see a valid case in either of those scenarios. - ty97 Nov 6, 01:31 3
  - for #1 I'm sure the Yes on 8 people will out up a stink about it. The Mormon church donated 21 million dollars to the campaign strictly based on - Stacy Nov 6, 01:41 2
    - In the don't invalidate the current marriages, then there is no standing in #1 as I can see. - ty97 Nov 6, 01:44 1
      - that makes sense -- nm - Stacy Nov 6, 02:31

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.