ST Alpha - "I'm not sure it's "hate" for all involved." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 168

I'm not sure it's "hate" for all involved.

Posted by ty97 Nov 6 '08, 06:59

I think that's what is so frustrating....some people oppose gay marriage on a principle that doesn't involve hate. It would be so much easier if it was just a bunch of bigots. It's not that simple.

It still angers me though.

Why were you mad at the gays?

Responses:

[deleted]
See, I don't get that..."on a principle that doesn't involve hate" WTF? I've not heard a single reason to vote for that prop that wasn't based on hate -- nm - The Calico Cat Coalition Nov 6, 07:04 1
- It depends on how narrow a definition of hate you're using. - znufrii -- least fighty poster Nov 6, 07:10
[deleted]

Post a message top

I'm not sure it's "hate" for all involved.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.