ST Alpha - "the false positives were for steriods, that doesnt mean that those players were not positive for another preformance enhacing drug. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "that he took legal over the counter supplements, which either could have caused a false positive or he was one of the people who didn't test positive " by Farmer Ted

the false positives were for steriods, that doesnt mean that those players were not positive for another preformance enhacing drug. -- nm

Posted by tRuMaN (aka tRuMaN) Aug 8 '09, 10:56

(No message)

Responses:

MLB and the union just said today that substances other than steroids (including legal ones) could have caused a positive result -- nm - Farmer Ted Aug 8, 10:58 2
- That's a caveat with any drug test. It's a pretty small chance though. - Inigo Aug 8, 11:02
- sure, but they also said they dont know who the 8 were or what caused the false positive. so basically, ortiz is using a loophole to not answer. -- nm - tRuMaN Aug 8, 11:00

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.