ST Alpha - "For Canada, which has a population of 30 million, maybe. For the US, which has ten times that, not so much -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "Something that MIGHT account for that: Canada and the US are extremely large, geographically. Building a network to service the entire country" by TWuG

For Canada, which has a population of 30 million, maybe. For the US, which has ten times that, not so much -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka RogerMore) Aug 11 '09, 08:11

(No message)

Responses:

Hmmm... out of a combination of interest and boredom, I checked the OECD data, and the cost in Australia is about half that of the US - Roger More Aug 11, 08:16 1
- I was going to draw this paralell too. australia's a particularly good comparison for canada. similar urban/rural split, similar concentration of - mafic Aug 11, 08:20
Cell towers generally don't care if they are servicing Manhatten or Billings, Montana. The tower still needs to be there to offer service. - TWuG Aug 11, 08:15 2
- Looking at the OECD data, I'm not sure that area, population size or density explain it -- nm - Roger More Aug 11, 08:18 1
  - (and unfortunately, nothing in the report indicates the reason for price differentiation - it just presents data) -- nm - Roger More Aug 11, 08:24

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.