Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 151
I'm going to go ahead and get on record that I thought District 9 was enjoyable, but stupid.
Posted by
Volnelk (aka Volnelk)
Aug 14 '09, 14:34
If people want to discuss it, I'm game.
Responses:
What's stupid is that studios can't make enjoyable movies with District 9's budget. -- nm
-
CovingtonCat
Aug 14, 14:41
4
I agree, it looked like a much bigger budget than $30 mil -- nm
-
ceregon
Aug 14, 14:43
3
Because there are no "names" starring in it or directing it. Pretty easy to stay under 50 mil when your leads and director aren't asking for 10 mil
-
TWuG
Aug 14, 14:46
2
(I don't know that announced movie budgets usually include cast salaries. I could be wrong, though.) -- nm
-
con_carne
Aug 14, 14:48
1
They do. -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 14, 15:01
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.