Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 163
In response to
"
What about 140 calories? -- nm
"
by
Mop (238 lbs)
did you walk at a slow, medium, or brisk pace? -- nm
Posted by
ty97
Aug 17 '09, 13:06
(No message)
Responses:
Brisk. I'm no a pleasant person to walk with. -- nm
-
Mop (238 lbs)
Aug 17, 13:10
I ask, because this calculator says I may be....wrong -- (link)
-
ty97
Aug 17, 13:07
6
Geez, even "Walking for pleasure" beats "Slow pace". That's odd. -- nm
-
Mop (238 lbs)
Aug 17, 13:11
3
Thanks for the link, by the way! -- nm
-
Mop (238 lbs)
Aug 17, 13:12
2
you're welcome. Caveat: I just googled the link, have never used it, and can't vouch for its validity -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 17, 13:13
GTK: reading burns more calories than watching TV. -- nm
-
Mop (238 lbs)
Aug 17, 13:13
I always wonder if these things take your basal rate into account. I suspect usually not. -- nm
-
mafic
Aug 17, 13:08
1
probably not. But they take the oregano rate into account. -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 17, 13:12
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
