|
In response to
"I believe so. I haven't actually taken a deep look into it yet; my past experience "
by
Will Hunting
|
ah.
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Aug 19 '09, 11:51
|
The only other thing I remember about Access is that it doesn't allow for a lot of concurrency.
And oracle ... is the opposite of Access, really. It's pretty much Big Iron software; shit interfaces, but complete work-horse code. Concurrency out the yinyang, tons of options for live backups and replication, it's a beast.
You would be ill-advised to use an Access database for a web interface back end .. but an Oracle database is behind a lot of major websites. There's a reason Ellison can afford his yachts.
|