Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 12:27
2: Dec 4, 09:36
3: Dec 4, 02:38
4: Dec 3, 14:19
5: Dec 3, 11:17
6: Dec 3, 07:33
7: Dec 2, 17:22
8: Dec 2, 11:48
9: Dec 2, 08:21
10: Dec 1, 17:33
11: Dec 1, 11:23
12: Nov 30, 15:54
13: Nov 30, 09:41
14: Nov 29, 16:44
15: Nov 29, 08:01
16: Nov 28, 16:19
17: Nov 28, 09:42
18: Nov 27, 18:07
19: Nov 27, 12:04
20: Nov 27, 08:26
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Paul Krugman hits the nail on the head, re: health care reform. -- (link)
"
by
znufrii
i still haven figured out why the employer is involved in health care
Posted by
Danedukenuuk
Aug 31 '09, 08:24
seems like an unreasonable constraint on workers
Responses:
well, after the government, it's the next logical level in terms of the percentage of people who would be affected.
-
znufrii
Aug 31, 08:27
3
If you assume you have to have a top-down approach. In Australia (for example) people choose their own private healthcare insurer -- nm
-
Roger More
Aug 31, 08:43
sure, but it also restricts (or can be restricting) you when changing jobs
-
Danedukenuuk
Aug 31, 08:39
1
Well, yes, I think the flaws in the employer-based model are evident.
-
znufrii
Aug 31, 08:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.