With all this talk about space debris and crap hitting the shuttle/ISS, why can't they just send up a big satellite with a kind of plate in the front
Posted by
oblique (aka kkuphal)
Sep 8 '09, 06:49
|
and just move it around and have it smash into all the crap up there obliterating it or jamming it into earth?
|
Responses:
-
or put the plate on the ISS to begin with??? -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Sep 8, 08:09
-
well, technically, if you placed a couple of small but powerfull magents in a corrected orbit, they would eventually increase in mass and become
-
tRuMaN
Sep 8, 07:28
6
-
you'll run the risk of creating collision chain reactions, potentially endangering everything that's up there. -- nm
-
znufrii
Sep 8, 07:07
-
They need to send up Quincy, Rocket, and his Drum Thumper. -- nm
-
TFox
Sep 8, 07:05
-
Space is big & satellites are only about the size of a bus. The debris isn't just lined up in one big lane, it's scattered across all kinds of longitudes, latitudes, and altitudes. -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 8, 07:00
1
-
Several things: Larger debris is easier to track. Any "plate" heavy or dense enough to stop, catch, or destroy debris would likely be too heavy to put
-
TWuG
Sep 8, 06:56
23
-
or maybe a giant magnet. It could spin around the earth grabbing all that debris right up. -- nm
-
decline
Sep 8, 06:50
2
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|