Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 151
In response to
"
Yes, and who do we have to thank for it?
"
by
Beryllium
I agree with Nixon, Clinton, and Bush II -- nm
Posted by
CrankYanker
Sep 8 '09, 16:42
(No message)
Responses:
Iran Contra = Reagan. Ironically, though, it was his integrity that causes you to disagree.
-
Beryllium
Sep 8, 16:44
5
Except that, Ollie North took the fall. -- nm
-
CrankYanker
Sep 8, 16:45
4
sfek, people wanted to believe it was government running without the President's knowledge. -- nm
-
CrankYanker
Sep 8, 16:48
3
uhm, Reagen went on the news in 1987 to *SAY* it was government running without the President's knowledge.
-
Beryllium
Sep 8, 16:51
2
exactly. He said it and people wanted to believe it..... some thought "he wouldn't lie to us" and others figured he was just too old to really know
-
CrankYanker
Sep 8, 16:53
1
Pretty much, the Independent Investigators found this to be accurate.
-
Will Hunting
Sep 8, 16:58
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
