Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
But this does not say there will be a separation of church and state or that the state cannot sponser a religious function. It says "make no law". -- nm
Posted by
Fuzzy (aka mrfuzzy)
Sep 9 '09, 07:35
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
[deleted]
10
[deleted]
9
[deleted]
4
[deleted]
3
Yes, that's true. You're one of the few people I've ever heard argue otherwise.
-
Inigo
Sep 9, 07:54
2
[deleted]
[deleted]
No, it means no endorsement of religion. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 9, 07:43
3
[deleted]
2
Jack gives good law. -- nm
-
Fuzzy
Sep 9, 07:56
ah, that's what you meant. I see now. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Sep 9, 07:49
And specifically "Congress". -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 9, 07:36
3
Almost every part of the Constitutions applicability to government was applied to the States long ago. -- nm
-
TWuG
Sep 9, 07:39
1
Yes, but it goes back to the "not in so many words" and "interpreted over time" part of the thread. -- nm
-
Ender
Sep 9, 07:42
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.