ST Alpha - "Disagree with assessment #2. The public option was more than mentioned. It's in. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Over. Mentioned, but not essential. Yes. -- nm" by TWuG

Disagree with assessment #2. The public option was more than mentioned. It's in. -- nm

Posted by TFox Sep 9 '09, 18:49

(No message)

Responses:

the definition is different though...everyone can't pick it -- nm - stewie Sep 9, 18:55
I doubt it. The Senate bill won't have it. The House bill will. It'll never make it out of committee - TWuG Sep 9, 18:52 9
- wait for it. it's in. -- nm - TFox Sep 9, 18:53 8
  - Only if it's limited by a trigger. I doubt the benchmarks insurers will have to meet will be rigorous enough to even come close to tripping it. -- nm - TWuG Sep 9, 18:56 7
    - he didn't mention a trigger... only that people who can't afford/get their own insurance would have a public option - stewie Sep 9, 19:02
    - yes, i agree it will not be a "full -- nm - TFox Sep 9, 18:57 5
      - ..."full" public option, and it may have a trigger point, and it may be limited to only the uninsured at first. - TFox Sep 9, 18:58 4
        
        I hope you are right, but I think the public option is dead. -- nm - TWuG Sep 9, 19:00 3
        
        "But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can't find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice." - Obama, tonight Sep 9, 19:02 2
        
        Yeah. He's been *real* effective so far getting what he wants out of this. -- nm - TWuG Sep 9, 19:05 1
        
        *sigh* just wait for it. -- nm - TFox Sep 9, 19:06

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.