ST Alpha - "*doesn't bother to read this thread because Redmond is always wrong* -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "I haven't been reading it. I just based my opinion on the players involved. -- nm" by Redmond Dawn

doesn't bother to read this thread because Redmond is always wrong -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka RogerMore) Sep 15 '09, 07:31

(No message)

Responses:

Ty admitted to me in person he takes sides he doesn't believe on ST. - Redmond Dawn Sep 15, 07:33 10
- Sure - I do the same as ty and I am just teasing you :) -- nm - Roger More Sep 15, 07:45
- What I'm posting here is my true feelings - ty97 Sep 15, 07:35 8
  - I don't think it's a witch-hunt when the organization has multiple incidents in different locations of highly questionable behavior. - Will Hunting Sep 15, 07:44 6
    - I think it's a witch hunt when there has been a string of accusations of varying credibility against the organization. - znufrii Sep 15, 07:46 4
      - See, one that finally sticks forces me to look at those other accusations for validity, not deem this one invalid. -- nm - Will Hunting Sep 15, 07:47 3
        
        I don't buy into that "the ends justify the witch hunt" kind of thinking. -- nm - znufrii Sep 15, 08:00 2
        
        I buy into the guilty people merit punishment. - Will Hunting Sep 15, 08:04
        
        You buy into thinking? -- nm - TFox Sep 15, 08:02
    - My IM isn't referring to this situation, it's referring to a completely different conversation Redmond and I had. -- nm - ty97 Sep 15, 07:45
  - Ah fair enough. I never know when you are just posting to take the opposite side of what you believe. - Redmond Dawn Sep 15, 07:37

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.