ST Alpha - "which would be great, if that's what this were really about. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Huh, I thought having multiple instances of employees helping pimps and hos would damage a reputation...turns out it's being barred by Congress. -- nm" by Will Hunting

which would be great, if that's what this were really about. -- nm

Posted by znufrii Sep 18 '09, 04:55

(No message)

Responses:

I'm just reading the article on Board 2. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 05:01 18
- which would be great, if that's what this were really about. -- nm - znufrii Sep 18, 05:07 17
  - Oh, it really is all about that. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 05:14 16
    - It's really strange, you're usually the first to decry bullsh!t of any variety, political or otherwise - znufrii Sep 18, 05:42 15
      - I believe in organizations playing by the rules first and foremost. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 05:54 14
        
        "just cuz they serve my ideological side more doesn't mean they should be allowed to get away with any bullshit." - TFox Sep 18, 06:05 12
        
        great, but what about when the other side does it? can we investigate that, or do we "look forward, not back" so as not to be seen as engaging in - znufrii Sep 18, 06:15 11
        
        I'm all for investigating everyone. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 06:20 10
        
        But again, unfortunately, the people driving the outrage over Acorn are in no way interested in taking the same approach towards everyone. - znufrii Sep 18, 06:25 9
        
        The amazing thing is those people have zero power in actually investigating. - Will Hunting Sep 18, 06:30
        
        Not every organization needs to be caught by the same investigator. One side has activists, the other does too. - TFox Sep 18, 06:30 5
        
        Unfortunately I don't have a partisan national media organization on my side to stoke the public's anger over what I find. - znufrii Sep 18, 06:36 4
        
        Because that is a real advantage of the Republican Party: all the media outlets sympathetic to their cause. -- nm - TFox Sep 18, 06:39
        
        BS, you have MSNBC. -- nm - Ender Sep 18, 06:37
        
        That's cuz MSNBC sucks at that job; not that there's no one out there to do it. -- nm - Will Hunting Sep 18, 06:37 1
        
        I actually think it has more to do with the character of the arguments being made. - znufrii Sep 18, 06:45
        
        Don't worry, both sides have hypocrites who only want to drive outrage over the other side. -- nm - Ender Sep 18, 06:28 1
        
        Well put. -- nm - znufrii Sep 18, 06:28
        
        If only the people driving this campaign shared your sense of righteous indignation. - znufrii Sep 18, 06:00

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.