ST Alpha - "Shift strategy from a large force to a targeted seek and destroy mission." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "Poll: What's your personal opinion on what the U.S. should do with troops in Afghanistan: stay the same, increase, or decrease?" by Don Homer

Shift strategy from a large force to a targeted seek and destroy mission.

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Oct 1 '09, 08:29

AQ is our enemy, the Taliban are an Afghani problem...and given the insane challenges of building that shithole up to the Stone Age....pass.

Responses:

if you fight the taliban you need some large force to ensure the contryside - Danedukenuuk Oct 1, 08:32 8
- I don't think you fight the Taliban. They're the Afghan's problem. - Will Hunting Oct 1, 08:36 7
  - you won't ensure a secure and acountable afghanistan whithout taking the power of the taliban out - Danedukenuuk Oct 1, 08:41 6
    - You want to solve Afghanistan...nuke em. - Will Hunting Oct 1, 08:43 5
      - hmmm they why go in in the first place? - Danedukenuuk Oct 1, 08:45 2
        
        Cuz they were hiding the real bad guys to us. - Will Hunting Oct 1, 08:48 1
        
        we're now the Soviet Union in the 80's, in respect to Afghanistan. -- nm - znufrii Oct 1, 08:49
      - And since that option isn't viable...it's time to walk away en masse. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 1, 08:44 1
        
        and prepare for a new impact? - Danedukenuuk Oct 1, 08:47
[deleted]

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.