Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 5, 10:39
2: Dec 5, 07:07
3: Dec 4, 18:10
4: Dec 4, 12:27
5: Dec 4, 09:36
6: Dec 4, 02:38
7: Dec 3, 14:19
8: Dec 3, 11:17
9: Dec 3, 07:33
10: Dec 2, 17:22
11: Dec 2, 11:48
12: Dec 2, 08:21
13: Dec 1, 17:33
14: Dec 1, 11:23
15: Nov 30, 15:54
16: Nov 30, 09:41
17: Nov 29, 16:44
18: Nov 29, 08:01
19: Nov 28, 16:19
20: Nov 28, 09:42
Posts: 158
In response to
"
no
"
by
Danedukenuuk
What they *should* do is drop the stupid tarriffs on foreign sugar that are there just to protect one Florida family's sugar business.
Posted by
TWuG
Oct 12 '09, 11:37
Sugar'd be cheaper and the increased taxes would be offset by cheaper ingredients.
Responses:
i think the idear is to make it *more* expecive to condume products with large amounts of sugar -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:39
5
That may be the rationale, but it's just an avenue to raise funds.
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:41
4
[deleted]
so nomatter what you do as a politician you're basically trying to f*ck the voter?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:44
2
Only if she's cute! -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:45
1
Palin explained?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:46
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.