Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 9, 10:33
2: Dec 9, 07:33
3: Dec 8, 17:50
4: Dec 8, 10:32
5: Dec 8, 06:23
6: Dec 7, 16:52
7: Dec 7, 07:17
8: Dec 6, 14:40
9: Dec 6, 10:07
10: Dec 6, 07:32
11: Dec 5, 19:48
12: Dec 5, 12:51
13: Dec 5, 10:39
14: Dec 5, 07:07
15: Dec 4, 18:10
16: Dec 4, 12:27
17: Dec 4, 09:36
18: Dec 4, 02:38
19: Dec 3, 14:19
20: Dec 3, 11:17
Posts: 158
In response to
"
no
"
by
Danedukenuuk
What they *should* do is drop the stupid tarriffs on foreign sugar that are there just to protect one Florida family's sugar business.
Posted by
TWuG
Oct 12 '09, 11:37
Sugar'd be cheaper and the increased taxes would be offset by cheaper ingredients.
Responses:
i think the idear is to make it *more* expecive to condume products with large amounts of sugar -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:39
5
That may be the rationale, but it's just an avenue to raise funds.
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:41
4
[deleted]
so nomatter what you do as a politician you're basically trying to f*ck the voter?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:44
2
Only if she's cute! -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:45
1
Palin explained?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:46
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.