Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 12:28
2: Dec 10, 09:30
3: Dec 10, 05:59
4: Dec 9, 17:07
5: Dec 9, 13:47
6: Dec 9, 10:33
7: Dec 9, 07:33
8: Dec 8, 17:50
9: Dec 8, 10:32
10: Dec 8, 06:23
11: Dec 7, 16:52
12: Dec 7, 07:17
13: Dec 6, 14:40
14: Dec 6, 10:07
15: Dec 6, 07:32
16: Dec 5, 19:48
17: Dec 5, 12:51
18: Dec 5, 10:39
19: Dec 5, 07:07
20: Dec 4, 18:10
Posts: 158
In response to
"
no
"
by
Danedukenuuk
What they *should* do is drop the stupid tarriffs on foreign sugar that are there just to protect one Florida family's sugar business.
Posted by
TWuG
Oct 12 '09, 11:37
Sugar'd be cheaper and the increased taxes would be offset by cheaper ingredients.
Responses:
i think the idear is to make it *more* expecive to condume products with large amounts of sugar -- nm
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:39
5
That may be the rationale, but it's just an avenue to raise funds.
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:41
4
[deleted]
so nomatter what you do as a politician you're basically trying to f*ck the voter?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:44
2
Only if she's cute! -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 12, 11:45
1
Palin explained?
-
Danedukenuuk
Oct 12, 11:46
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.