ST Alpha - "sure they are, in that they don't contain 150 nutritionless calories per can. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "I would assume so. It's not like it's better for you than regular soda. -- nm" by TWuG

sure they are, in that they don't contain 150 nutritionless calories per can. -- nm

Posted by Reagen (aka Reagen) Oct 12 '09, 11:41

(No message)

Responses:

instead they contain artificial chemicals. - znufrii Oct 12, 11:42 6
- we just had the discussion the other day. Not proven in any meaningful manner. - Reagen Oct 12, 11:44
- Your IM: Such as? -- nm - con_carne Oct 12, 11:43 4
  - Diet sodas give the illusion (to many) of being good for you. -- nm - Spawn Oct 12, 11:43 3
    - no one should claim it's health food. But as an alternative to drinking the same amount of regular pop, it's better for you. - Reagen Oct 12, 11:46
    - actually diet soda's are an illution to everyone - Danedukenuuk Oct 12, 11:45
    - I would never say my Cherry Coke Zero is good for me but it is significantly better for me than drinking sugared pop -- nm - oblique Oct 12, 11:45

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.