Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Yeah, I'm pretty sure a "positive" imkage showing contraband, etc would almost be required as evidence in the case against the person.
"
by
TWuG
Not really, they could just take the contraband off the person. THAT's the evidence. -- nm
Posted by
Ender (aka Ender)
Oct 13 '09, 10:02
(No message)
Responses:
My guess is that the border security people have to demonstrate why they chose to search that person -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 13, 10:07
2
[deleted]
1
It's not like cops have to provide an air sample when they have a driver do a sobriety test because they smelled booze. -- nm
-
Ender
Oct 13, 10:11
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.