ST Alpha - "What I'm trying to understand is the statement that true technical HD is 135 Mbps -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "I hope this chart comes out OK. Here's my information on what different services refer to as "HD" on the web (not of it is technically HD)." by Mop (231 lbs)

What I'm trying to understand is the statement that true technical HD is 135 Mbps -- nm

Posted by Guigue (aka Guigue) Oct 13 '09, 14:17

(No message)

Responses:

That's only for 720p. For 1080p, it's 237 Mbps. A Blu-ray disc can hold 35 Gb of data, but still only holds 3 hours of video. - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:33
Raw video is very large. I don't know if it's that large, but it's very large. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 13, 14:18 10
- No consumer service is ever going to deliver uncompressed video -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:21 8
  - What's that, Bill Gates? - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:33 5
    - But you're talking decades probably -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:34 4
      - Moore's Law. 5 years and I bet we get uncompressed 4k. - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:40 3
        
        *stares at is 1.5Mbps DSL* - oblique Oct 13, 14:41 2
        
        Fiber-to-the-home (although copper ain't dead yet...) -- (link) - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:46 1
        
        2006...I'm still waiting -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:47
  - well duh. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 13, 14:21 1
    - Just makes it a weird number to bring up when discussing the technicalities of HD delivery -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:21
- Oh I know, I work with uncompressed 10 bit HD all day long (4.3 GB for a 30 second ad with sound) - Guigue Oct 13, 14:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.