ST Alpha - "Raw video is very large. I don't know if it's that large, but it's very large. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "What I'm trying to understand is the statement that true technical HD is 135 Mbps -- nm" by Guigue

Raw video is very large. I don't know if it's that large, but it's very large. -- nm

Posted by Beryllium (aka grayman) Oct 13 '09, 14:18

(No message)

Responses:

No consumer service is ever going to deliver uncompressed video -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:21 8
- What's that, Bill Gates? - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:33 5
  - But you're talking decades probably -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:34 4
    - Moore's Law. 5 years and I bet we get uncompressed 4k. - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:40 3
      - *stares at is 1.5Mbps DSL* - oblique Oct 13, 14:41 2
        
        Fiber-to-the-home (although copper ain't dead yet...) -- (link) - Mop (231 lbs) Oct 13, 14:46 1
        
        2006...I'm still waiting -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:47
- well duh. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 13, 14:21 1
  - Just makes it a weird number to bring up when discussing the technicalities of HD delivery -- nm - oblique Oct 13, 14:21
Oh I know, I work with uncompressed 10 bit HD all day long (4.3 GB for a 30 second ad with sound) - Guigue Oct 13, 14:20

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.