ST Alpha - "The original Saw wasn't nearly as gruesome as I remembered. It was actually a lot better of a movie that I recall. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

The original Saw wasn't nearly as gruesome as I remembered. It was actually a lot better of a movie that I recall. -- nm

Posted by prayformojo (aka mayhem) Oct 20 '09, 06:30

(No message)

Responses:

except for the worst performance by a cast member of The Princess Bride of all time. -- nm - Reagen Oct 20, 06:53 2
- Really? You would call that the worst performance of Cary Elwes' career? - Jim Oct 20, 07:03 1
  - If he's thrown under that, that's truly frightening. -- nm - Reagen Oct 20, 07:07
isn't that the way it is w/ most movies and their sequels? 1st one good, others, not so much -- nm - i'm not Undead yet ! Oct 20, 06:50
The first one I actually enjoy a lot. Its a shame that they've never churned out a decent sequel. -- nm - TFox Oct 20, 06:31 7
- I never saw your Blair Witch 2 thoughts... - Jim Oct 20, 06:32 6
  - I think I said C+. I think I stand by that. (spoils/thoughts inside) - TFox Oct 20, 06:37 5
    - Very good. Nice to see you didn't just dismiss it as crap. (spoils) - Jim Oct 20, 06:49 4
      - Wait, so (spoils) - TFox Oct 20, 06:53 3
        
        It's been a while since I've watched it...but yep...that's how I came out of it thinking. (spoils) - Jim Oct 20, 07:04 2
        
        hmm. interesting. i went a completely different way with it. (spoils) - TFox Oct 20, 07:12 1
        
        Hmmm...now I have to go home and watch it again. By the way... - Jim Oct 20, 07:16

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.