Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 157
well, the state isn't doing it on purpose. -- nm
Posted by
TFox
Oct 20 '09, 07:45
(No message)
Responses:
if they convict a man to death, it's 'on purpose.' -- nm
-
Andie
Oct 20, 07:48
4
yes, on purpose, with a purpose that, admittedly will never be 100% foolproof. nothing can be. -- nm
-
TFox
Oct 20, 07:50
3
you know how you could not accidently kill an innocent man? don't use the death penalty.
-
Andie
Oct 20, 07:52
1
my point isn't so much that we should use it more, or expand it, or speed it up.
-
TFox
Oct 20, 07:55
which is why it's a good idea to be able to take it back. -- nm
-
Reagen
Oct 20, 07:52
[deleted]
3
that's spin, lawyer-boy. the system is not intending to kill innocent people. murderers are. that's why it's called "murder". -- nm
-
TFox
Oct 20, 07:49
2
how does *accidentally* killing an innocent person make them any less dead? -- nm
-
Andie
Oct 20, 07:56
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.