Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 155
In response to
"
not a full picture by any means, but there have been 244 convictions overturned through DNA evidence in the last 20 years. -- (link)
"
by
znufrii
Of course, in many cases there won't be any DNA evidence. -- nm
Posted by
Don Homer (aka DonHomer)
Oct 20 '09, 08:30
(No message)
Responses:
this is why I leave traces of my seed everywhere. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Oct 20, 08:30
I believe in *most* cases there is no DNA evidence. which means there are probably a great many innocent people in prison. -- nm
-
loosilu
Oct 20, 08:30
3
"� 22 percent of cases closed by the Innocence Project since 2004 were closed because of lost or missing evidence." -- nm
-
znufrii
Oct 20, 08:31
1
so 78% were overturned for DNA evidence, which means DNA evidence is the best basis for overturning. -- nm
-
loosilu
Oct 20, 08:32
No doubt. -- nm
-
Don Homer
Oct 20, 08:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.