ST Alpha - "Is this really the best way for the White House to go? -- (link)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

Is this really the best way for the White House to go? -- (link)

Posted by Todd Manning (aka Nuditarian) Oct 20 '09, 15:44

(No message)

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/todays-qs-for-os-wh-10202009.html (blogs.abcnews.com)

Responses:

Gibbs is friggin awful. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 20, 17:27
Well...according to that non-news orginization the current president is the enemy. - the liioulu without cake Oct 20, 15:46
whoever issued that idea should get fired. Stupid, Stupid stupid. The WH just gave Fox 'News' more ammo. -- nm - Remlik Oct 20, 15:46 8
- I know! I mean, Fox News has Geraldo. How can you get more brass-straps news coverage than having Geraldo? It doesn't get newsier. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 20, 15:53
- Yeah, Fox might decide to turn more against Democrats because of this. - Reagen Oct 20, 15:49 6
  - I don't think what Fox's talking heads might do that's the issue, it's that you now have a White House who because they don't always receive fawning - Stephen Oct 20, 16:57 3
    - Well, I disagree with the move, but Fox is hardly just "not fawning"; willfully and blatantly ignorant of facts is more like it. -- nm - Beryllium Oct 20, 17:04 2
      - Not to mention the outright lies at times. -- nm - the liioulu without cake Oct 20, 17:17 1
        
        Yeah! Fricken lying liars! -- nm - Dan Rather Oct 20, 17:34
  - it's just a stupid idea. -- nm - Remlik Oct 20, 16:16
  - They can always whip up some more protest marches and then protest more when they aren't covered by the liberal media -- nm - Roger More Oct 20, 16:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.