Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 151
Saw VI: only $14.8 million. Yikes. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Oct 25 '09, 08:56
(No message)
Responses:
You misspelled, "Hurrah!" -- nm
-
Qale
Oct 25, 10:55
They make these super cheaply, don't they? I assume it would still be quite profitable for the studio at that level? -- nm
-
Subversive
Oct 25, 09:00
6
Throw in marketing costs and probably not quite the cash cow it once was. -- nm
-
Cuzzin Todd
Oct 25, 09:55
1
I don't know why they should keep paying the actor playing Jigsaw, considering (spoiler)
-
Qale
Oct 25, 10:56
Saw V cost $10.8M to make. -- nm
-
James Bond (aka Igor)
Oct 25, 09:15
Most likely....but now they need to figure if it was a Paranormal Activity slash or a Franchise is dying slash. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Oct 25, 09:00
2
The next Saw movie is in 3D. -- nm
-
Dano
Oct 25, 09:47
Exactly. -- nm
-
David
Oct 25, 09:22
It got halved. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Oct 25, 09:00
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.