ST Alpha - "They make these super cheaply, don't they? I assume it would still be quite profitable for the studio at that level? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "Saw VI: only $14.8 million. Yikes. -- nm" by David

They make these super cheaply, don't they? I assume it would still be quite profitable for the studio at that level? -- nm

Posted by Subversive Oct 25 '09, 09:00

(No message)

Responses:

Throw in marketing costs and probably not quite the cash cow it once was. -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Oct 25, 09:55 1
- I don't know why they should keep paying the actor playing Jigsaw, considering (spoiler) - Qale Oct 25, 10:56
Saw V cost $10.8M to make. -- nm - James Bond (aka Igor) Oct 25, 09:15
Most likely....but now they need to figure if it was a Paranormal Activity slash or a Franchise is dying slash. -- nm - Will Hunting Oct 25, 09:00 2
- The next Saw movie is in 3D. -- nm - Dano Oct 25, 09:47
- Exactly. -- nm - David Oct 25, 09:22

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.