Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 161
I think eventually the Dems are going to have to use that budgetary procedure to get it through with 50 votes. -- nm
Posted by
TFox
Oct 27 '09, 11:48
(No message)
Responses:
Perfectly acceptable when faced with an obstructionist opponent. -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 27, 11:50
[deleted]
11
Word all around! -- nm
-
Krusty
Oct 27, 11:50
10
I don't understand how the dems allow him to caucus with them.
-
Krusty
Oct 27, 11:52
9
[deleted]
4
so, it's down to 90%
-
znufrii
Oct 27, 12:19
Not good enough! Silence the heretic! -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Oct 27, 12:16
2
[deleted]
1
Comparitavely? You bet. -- nm
-
Dr.Vermin
Oct 27, 12:21
[deleted]
1
He was real close to getting ousted last election, considering that he looked as bad as he ever had at that point I don't see him
-
Krusty
Oct 27, 12:01
It gives them 60 votes. Usually. -- nm
-
TWuG
Oct 27, 11:55
1
yeah, really, if they don't, it just means they are at 59. there's no real benefit to them to not let him. this way they are filibuster-proof for like
-
TFox
Oct 27, 11:56
[deleted]
5
(not that, however, a filibuster from a minority is 100% unsmarmy. just more common.) -- nm
-
TFox
Oct 27, 12:01
What does this even mean? -- nm
-
con_calabazas
Oct 27, 11:53
2
from my (limited) understanding, there's a process called reconciliation that allows controversial bills to go through Congress without filibuster -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 27, 11:59
1
Oh. I don't know that that was ever not in the cards. *shrug* -- nm
-
con_calabazas
Oct 27, 12:01
it is, but i think they are going to have to. they can't not pass something, they want to pass something bold, and i don't think they can with 60. -- nm
-
TFox
Oct 27, 11:49
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.