|
In response to
"gotcha. seems like there's so many estimates out there now that opponents/proponents can just pick and choose whatever set of numbers best supports"
by
znufrii
|
And I even agree with not including all the costs. Because, for example, repealing SGR is expensive, but that was an insane law.
Posted by
TFox
Nov 3 '09, 10:41
|
And they have been skirting paying for the SGR for years, and never ever intended it to go through, on either party, so it shouldn't matter. Those "costs" are not costs because in practice we would never, ever, ever ever ever have saved that money.
Changing the structure of Part D coverage is different; I think tallying those costs is wholly appropriate.
|