Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 153
In response to
"
The ending of that game was everything that is great about football.
"
by
David
100% disagree with you that, that was the right call. No other coach calls that at their own 30. -- nm
Posted by
Redmond (aka redmond)
Nov 15 '09, 20:52
(No message)
Responses:
Switzer did that against the Eagles once...Same outcome -- nm
-
amoxy
Nov 15, 21:05
1
I can't believe I'm saying this, but that was even worse.
-
Jelly
Nov 15, 21:07
And that is exactly why he is a HoF coach. He worries about winning rather than getting second guessed.
-
David
Nov 15, 20:55
41
This is true - if they convert there, he finished the game that his team couldn't.
-
Jelly
Nov 15, 20:56
Well tonight he's a losing coach. Also he's an idiot. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 20:56
39
He lost tonight but that is because a player didn't catch the ball. He has championships because he makes choices that brave. -- nm
-
David
Nov 15, 20:59
37
I don't think it was a brave choice. At best I would call it a desperate choice. At worst I would say an extreme lapse in judgement.
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:00
36
I saw it as the decision of a coach who knew his defense was done for the night.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:08
22
His defense was only done when the Pats didn't convert.
-
Jelly
Nov 15, 21:11
Well if his defense was done, they sure didn't need Peyton on their own 30. LOL I love this debate.
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:10
20
I'm saying that it didn't matter if they stuck them inside the 20.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:13
18
So punting = guaranteed TD? -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:15
17
Seriously, did you watch the drive before?
-
David
Nov 15, 21:19
8
I saw the drive after too. Was a pretty quick one, because they started on the Pats 30. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:21
7
Exactly the point that destroys your argument. Ball position was irrelevant. NE was toast on defense. -- nm
-
David
Nov 15, 21:23
6
i will say: the Colts showed total disregard for the Pats' ability to stop them at the end.
-
TFox
Nov 15, 21:25
1
That's probably because the Pats lacked that ability.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:26
There is a thing called a clock. BTW was Peyton 100% accurate on that drive? No misses, or drops? -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:24
3
One incompletion after the INT.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:32
2
You are right. Bill made the right call. Did they win now that I agree? -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:33
1
Of course I'm right. Yes, he did. No, because football isn't chess.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:45
against peyton manning?
-
baldrick
Nov 15, 21:16
7
So those 5 punts in the first half by Indy was because he was lulling them into a false sense of security?
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:18
6
80 yards in 90 seconds. Nice try on the selective memory, though. -- nm
-
David
Nov 15, 21:20
4
Stop being biased because we disagree on another point. He is saying by the fact that he is Peyton Manning the game is over.
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:23
3
To be fair, I would say the same thing about Brady.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:38
you're making the point. any other QB in the world and Belichick punts in that situation -- nm
-
baldrick
Nov 15, 21:28
1
Uh, he should have still punted so yeah. He should have punted if that was Joe Montana. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:30
first half is bygones. maybe the only QB better at driving the field for a win in the last two minutes is Brady himself -- nm
-
baldrick
Nov 15, 21:20
Being at the other 20 hadn't helped them any two minutes prior. I think BB was paying closer attention to that than you were.
-
David
Nov 15, 21:13
It was a winning call and the right play. Had the guy not muffed it, you aren't saying a word right now.
-
David
Nov 15, 21:03
10
I would still say it was the wrong call and he got lucky if it worked. But we can agree to disagree.
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:07
9
Whereas most everyone else would be saying it was a bold call, and the reason he has those rings.
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:10
8
It was a bold call, but I guarantee that even Bill will admit that there was a sequence of poorly executed plays down the stretch that hurt.
-
TFox
Nov 15, 21:13
"I like it when a coach makes a bold move to win a game instead of a conservative play to not lose a game." He made a bold move that lost the game.
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:13
6
"...to win the game." Not "...that won the game."
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:21
But of course we will. Because it didn't work. Not saying it was brilliant, but the fact that 99% of people will call that dumb when it doesn't work
-
TFox
Nov 15, 21:15
4
C'mon people, there was an entire episode of Sports Night about this very thing!
-
the wrong element, bad guy
Nov 15, 21:25
I posted this before the snap of the ball. Because I felt there was no way he does something that stupid. -- (link)
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:19
[Backboard]
2
And then you hedged your bets, saying he had balls, and not that he was dumb. -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 15, 21:19
1
My definition of having balls isn't that you are smart. I could go punch a MMA fighter because I have balls but I still get my assed kicked after I
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:26
It was completely his Ego getting the best of him -- nm
-
GWAA
Nov 15, 21:02
1
Like I said, I have no clue why he did it. It was just a shock when that ball snapped. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 21:03
To clarify. He's an idiot tonight. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 20:57
if I am up by 10, I might make that call. but when I am up by 7 or less, no way do I make that call. -- nm
-
Truman
Nov 15, 20:53
4
Sure up by 2 scores, you can take that risk. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 20:53
3
"risk" (two scores, we're not even discussing this game.) -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 15, 20:54
I still wouldn't but at least you have more room for error. -- nm
-
Redmond
Nov 15, 20:53
1
Unless maybe you have running backs
-
eag
Nov 15, 20:57
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.