Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 152
In response to
"
"These calculations are based on the projection that in 10 years 43% of Americans adults may be obese..."
"
by
TFox
how much is technically obese now? -- nm
Posted by
ty97
Nov 18 '09, 07:49
(No message)
Responses:
Mayo Clinic says most doctors go by BMI. -- (link)
-
mara
Nov 18, 07:53
2
[deleted]
1
Yeah, I was surprised to see them still citing it. On the other hand, it's each individual doctor's call, about each individual patient. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 18, 07:56
roughly 30 pounds over "healthy weight", which I think that target number is also bullcrap.
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:51
23
i fully believe that Americans (and Canadians) are heading that way. -- nm
-
Elf Andie
Nov 18, 07:54
[deleted]
9
it says we are overly obese, sure. it does not say that number is sensical. -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:55
2
[deleted]
1
ok -- nm
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:58
Actually, I think Australia overtook the US as fattest nation -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 18, 07:55
5
the UK is pretty fat now as well, I believe. -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 18, 07:57
[deleted]
3
here we go -- (link)
-
Roger More
Nov 18, 07:59
2
[deleted]
1
Well, Australians do feel better about being #1, no matter what qualifiers they have to use -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 18, 08:04
I thought it was 30 percent? -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 18, 07:52
11
it's 34 percent now, trended forward to 43 percent. but i don't understand how they are calculating "weight-related medical bills" at all.
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:54
10
[deleted]
4
that would seem to be a reasonable and proper way. another way would be to count all the diabetes, since fatness causes it.
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:58
3
[deleted]
2
ingrained institutional bias against a perceived moral failing. -- nm
-
znufrii
Nov 18, 08:09
1
[deleted]
many diseases are more common when you are overweight (such as type 2 diabetes). -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 18, 07:55
blood pressure, diabetes, etc are all absolutely weight issues for a huge number of people -- nm
-
Elf Andie
Nov 18, 07:55
3
yes i know. i just don't know what they are counting as weight-related.
-
TFox
Nov 18, 07:56
2
I'd assume, the increased chance of having those diseases due to your weight -- nm
-
Roger More
Nov 18, 07:57
yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if they stretched the definition for shock value. -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 18, 07:57
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.