Poll: an important author wills that his unseen manuscript be burned unpublished upon his death. Comply, or publish it anyway?
Posted by
Max
Nov 19 '09, 10:06
|
the catalyst: Nabokov's "The Original of Laura" was apparently published posthumously against his wishes.
|
Responses:
-
Publish. The dead have no rights!
-
Dr.Vermin
Nov 19, 10:34
-
I think the important parallel is with Tupac's unfinished rhymes. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 19, 10:19
2
-
my mom is no author, but she's told me I must under no circumstances read her diaries after she dies.
-
mafic
Nov 19, 10:17
3
-
i'd at least read it first to see if it's any good.. -- nm
-
i'm not dead yet !
Nov 19, 10:16
-
Profit. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 19, 10:12
1
-
adapt it into a screenplay then you technically aren't publishing that work -- nm
-
zork
Nov 19, 10:12
1
-
I'd read it, read it, make a personal copy then comply with the burn wish. (nm)
-
musubi
Nov 19, 10:10
1
-
probably neither. i wouldn't publish, but i might keep it. -- nm
-
Elf Andie
Nov 19, 10:10
- [deleted]
-
Digitize then burn. Send it to selected people. See what they think. -- nm
-
mara
Nov 19, 10:08
2
-
Comply. -- nm
-
Krusty
Nov 19, 10:08
-
burn it. -- nm
-
Jim
Nov 19, 10:08
-
Like he's gonna know. Publish it. -- nm
-
JaxSean
Nov 19, 10:08
-
if he wanted it destroyed he should have done it himself. -- nm
-
loosilu
Nov 19, 10:07
43
-
Comply. -- nm
-
ReluctantCynic
Nov 19, 10:07
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|