In response to
"Edward Cullen is just behind Harry Potter for character of the 2000s. "
by
David
|
You're arguing against a point that no one's making. There's not one person that hasn't conceeded that this has been a huge money maker.
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Nov 19 '09, 15:08
|
What we're saying is that it's just not going to live beyond this first run. These aren't contradictory points.
|
Responses:
|