Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Lord, no. Take someone less useful and polarizing who doens't rhyme with Don Jerry. -- nm
"
by
Will Hunting
Weren't you--wait, now I'm confused. -- nm
Posted by
nubby
Nov 14 '08, 14:15
(No message)
Responses:
She's great at what she does; not Sec State imo. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 14, 14:25
6
You're being disingenuous with this one. If you thought she was good enough for POTUS, you think she's good enough for SoS. -- nm
-
David
Nov 14, 14:28
4
No, I'm not. I don't think her vision for the world is the same as the person she'd be rep'ing.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 14, 14:31
3
SoS is an even better gig than VP. After Chief of Staff, it's THE position in the executive branch. How is that a supporting role? -- nm
-
David
Nov 14, 14:35
2
I didn't particularly want her as VP.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 14, 14:39
1
I also say it was dumb for him to not reach out and make her clearly a VP candidate since she was so vital a force.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 14, 14:57
Oh, got it, thanks. -- nm
-
nubby
Nov 14, 14:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.