I'm not convinced that if GM "fails", unemployment skyrockets.
Posted by
Dr.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin)
Nov 14 '08, 15:09
|
If they are forced to declare *bankruptcy*, as I understand it, nothing disappears, the ownership merely changes.
|
Responses:
-
Depending on the type of bankruptcy, the owner may or may not change. Heck, it could result with the doors being padlocked closed and a not from the
-
Trish
Nov 14, 15:45
-
A typical bankruptcy situation is much smaller and financing is always needed during the reorganization
-
Stewie
Nov 14, 15:36
1
-
would that not be a "bailout" ? -- nm
-
DaneDukeNuuk
Nov 14, 15:14
7
-
I believe my position has consistently been against bailouts in the US marketplace.
-
Beryllium
Nov 14, 15:13
10
-
it's not just the manufacturer. it's the ancillary businesses, like machinists and parts suppliers and dealers etc. -- nm
-
pretty awesome pigby
Nov 14, 15:12
6
-
I believe I proved that GM can fail repeatly without loss of employment. (nm)
-
Matt Millen
Nov 14, 15:12
-
Who buys a car from a company that has declared bankruptcy and might be gone in a year? -- nm
-
sgtmike
Nov 14, 15:11
2
-
GM would continue, although substantially downscaled. A best case scenario, though...
-
Mop
Nov 14, 15:11
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|