Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 162
A-Rod's listed bio has him at a 28.5. It wouldn't take much to push him over 30.
Posted by
Reagen (aka Reagen)
Nov 30 '09, 09:31
BMI is a good tool for populations but bad as an indicator for individuals.
Responses:
[deleted]
9
his subject and IM are part of the same thought.
-
Reagen
Nov 30, 09:41
8
[deleted]
7
That's what moose was saying. I don't know what else to say here. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 30, 09:43
6
[deleted]
5
You're transcribing him incorrectly. His post in full:
-
Reagen
Nov 30, 09:48
4
[deleted]
1
It's perfectly sensible. 30 is a high number, ***unless*** you're a bodybuilder or athlete. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 30, 09:52
and if you change "high" to a word like "stringent", then it kind of makes more sense -- nm
-
Beryllium
Nov 30, 09:50
1
that would change the meaning. 30 isn't stringent. 25+ (the BMI definition of overweight) would be stringent. -- nm
-
Reagen
Nov 30, 09:51
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.