ST Alpha - "(spoiler)" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 164

In response to "Star Trek question (this hangup is killing the movie for me) [spoilers, natch]" by prayformojo

(spoiler)

Posted by Qale (aka Qale) Nov 30 '09, 10:33

Due to huge lens flair, his essence was easily able to move through the bright distracting light. That allowed him to appear where it was most convenient.

Show Spoilers

Responses:

I liked how on the special features for the DVD, the CGI crew discussed the lens flare used in filming, and how they had to replicate it in the CGI - Roger More Nov 30, 10:34 11
- I wouldn't have noticed it nearly as much until people mentioned it. - Will Hunting Nov 30, 10:47 1
  - It's like the shaky-cam in the Bourne movies - it passed over a lot of people but bothered a large minority -- nm - Roger More Nov 30, 10:54
- I honestly never noticed this once. -- nm - Reagen Nov 30, 10:41 2
  - I'm not sure I would have noticed much if not for such a big deal being made of them. -- nm - prayformojo Nov 30, 10:43
  - I joked about it a ton, but I think I only noticed a few flares -- nm - Beryllium Nov 30, 10:43
- D*Con TV took on Lens Flare -- (link) - Qale Nov 30, 10:38
- that fact made me angrier about it. "dudes, you created flare *you wouldn't normally see under those circumstances.*" -- nm - Max Nov 30, 10:37 3
  - Their explanation was that it added life to the screen, while 'space' looks kind of boring -- nm - Roger More Nov 30, 10:40 2
    - just like the "I'm not touching you!" game adds life to a boring car ride, sure. -- nm - Max Nov 30, 10:44 1
      - KIRKSPOCK PUNCH BUGGY! -- nm - Beryllium Nov 30, 10:44
- Haha! -- nm - Qale Nov 30, 10:36

Post a message top

(spoiler)

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.