Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 16:44
2: Nov 29, 08:01
3: Nov 28, 16:19
4: Nov 28, 09:42
5: Nov 27, 18:07
6: Nov 27, 12:04
7: Nov 27, 08:26
8: Nov 26, 18:06
9: Nov 26, 12:05
10: Nov 26, 08:29
11: Nov 25, 18:33
12: Nov 25, 11:12
13: Nov 25, 07:08
14: Nov 24, 13:17
15: Nov 23, 18:13
16: Nov 23, 06:17
17: Nov 22, 13:24
18: Nov 22, 09:09
19: Nov 21, 22:36
20: Nov 21, 14:03
Posts: 157
In response to
"
Because James Cameron is junior Stephen Spielberg!
"
by
Spawn
people can see what I mean when I say that, though, right? -- nm
Posted by
Beryllium (aka grayman)
Dec 2 '09, 11:47
(No message)
Responses:
Totally, even though I still like both directors a lot.
-
con_carne
Dec 2, 11:53
5
"Indulgent" is the word I'm thinking of, but neither director is completely so, IMO -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 2, 11:58
4
That's exactly the right word. And you're right, neither one fully succumbs to the indulgence ... but they do stray from the path, at times.
-
Beryllium
Dec 2, 12:00
3
To be honest, if I had the career, success and acclamation of either, I'd be an ego-driven self-indulgent buffoon too -- nm
-
Roger More
Dec 2, 12:01
2
Oh, me too :) -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 2, 12:04
If I had the career, success, and acclimation of either ... I'd be a reclusive hermit. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Dec 2, 12:04
Wait, you said that?
-
Spawn
Dec 2, 11:50
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
