ST Alpha - "It was Titanic as done by rank amateurs. Most infuritating, we won't get another one filmed there for years, if ever." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 155

In response to "Pearl Harbor was awesome, what are you talking about? Almost 3 hours of pure romance and occasional action -- nm" by Hotkiss

It was Titanic as done by rank amateurs. Most infuritating, we won't get another one filmed there for years, if ever.

Posted by Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz) Dec 2 '09, 14:59

Michael Bay dreams of having half of James Cameron's talent.

Responses:

The difference between Titanic and Pearl Harbor - eag Dec 2, 15:05 1
- Exactly why it was Titanic done by rank amateurs. We forgto...10% Saving Private Ryan for the realism of the battle. - Will Hunting Dec 2, 15:07
Yeah but Pearl Harbor had Josh Hartnett, king of my laminated list from 1998 to 2001 -- nm - Hotkiss Dec 2, 15:02 5
- You're right. Who can argue with a three-year crush? -- nm - Reagen Dec 2, 15:03
- And Pearl Harbor and 40 Days and 40 Nights are 2 prime reasons Josh Hartnett is no long on anyone's list, including casting directors. - Will Hunting Dec 2, 15:03 3
  - he was good in Hollywood Homicide -- nm - Beryllium Dec 2, 15:03 2
    - I knew I forgothe final nail in the coffin :) -- nm - Will Hunting Dec 2, 15:04 1
      - heheh ... it wasn't the greatest movie, but I felt that it held promise for a very good sequel -- nm - Beryllium Dec 2, 15:08

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.