Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 157
In response to
"
Ndamukong Suh for Heisman! -- (link)
"
by
not2fast
If I had a vote, it'd be Ingram, Suh, Gerhart. (nm)
Posted by
musubi
Dec 8 '09, 09:31
But I don't think it's clear cut by any means, any of the five could win.
Responses:
As long as McCoy doesn't win... (look at his #'s vs good competition), I'm good.
-
Will Hunting
Dec 8, 09:32
3
It made me absolutely sick that Texas won, despite that *horrendous* clock management. Teams that badly run don't deserve to win.
-
musubi
Dec 8, 09:35
2
I didn't see the game, I just saw a stat that said McCoy's avg'ed like 175yds with 2 TDs and 7 INTs vs top-75 Passing Defenses or something mediocre. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Dec 8, 09:38
Also, Texas owes that win to Suh being so good. If he didn't break through Texas's line so quickly, McCoy would have run the clock to zero. (nm)
-
musubi
Dec 8, 09:36
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
