Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 172
In response to
"
This is why I think more energy/money should be put into carbon sequestration. Alot more. -- nm
"
by
Loyola
[googles] Hmm! That definitely seems more forward-looking. -- nm
Posted by
Agent.Vermin (aka Dr.Vermin)
Dec 8 '09, 11:34
(No message)
Responses:
if the ennergy consumption for CCS can be lowered AND the carbon stored safely then it's pritty smart
-
Danedukenuuk
Dec 8, 11:40
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.