Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 182
In response to
"
perhaps, but not so concrete as this (and not with several mistresses) -- nm
"
by
Guy
It's been a magazine cover focus for several years. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Dec 8 '09, 14:01
(No message)
Responses:
everything they print is true!
-
Guy
Dec 8, 14:07
7
Who said a scandal has to be accurate to affect marketability? -- nm
-
Agent.Vermin
Dec 8, 14:09
Why did no one remind me I was talking to Guy? -- nm
-
David
Dec 8, 14:08
1
im not arguing anyone's fidelity, im arguing in context of b's question
-
Guy
Dec 8, 14:11
you really think Brad Pitt waited to jam Angelina until he and Jennifer were over? really? -- nm
-
TFox
Dec 8, 14:07
3
of course not. my point is that Tiger was caught red-handed and in the court of public opinion, that matters. -- nm
-
Guy
Dec 8, 14:09
2
all of this Tiger stuff, fwiw, is completely unsubstantiated thus far. He hasn't admitted to much of anything specific.
-
TFox
Dec 8, 14:11
his hand was in the cookie jar!
-
Beryllium
Dec 8, 14:10
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
