ST Alpha - ""Belief" is not about whether something can be proved. Faith plays a big role. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 163

In response to "Well, when 55% believe in unprovable angels, it's hard to show them something that is proven." by JaxSean

"Belief" is not about whether something can be proved. Faith plays a big role. -- nm

Posted by con_carne Dec 9 '09, 08:35

(No message)

Responses:

The problem is that Faith in an unprovable God is in direct opposition of Evolution of man. -- nm - JaxSean Dec 9, 08:39 17
- there are many ways of reconciling that. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:46
- I don't believe that. I have no problem reconciling my belief in God and evolution -- nm - oblique Dec 9, 08:45 5
  - So do you believe in Adam and Eve (and such), and that God created "man" in the form we currently are? - JaxSean Dec 9, 08:50 4
    - I don't believe in Adam and Eve as literal people, no. I take much of the origin stories in the bible to be metephorical (is that the right word)? - oblique Dec 9, 08:53 1
      - Interesting, thanks. - JaxSean Dec 9, 08:55
    - You are describing religious funamentalists, who believe the Bible word for word. Mos religious people are not fundametalist. -- nm - con_carne Dec 9, 08:51 1
      - yes, the literalists are a small subset. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:52
- That's debatable -- nm - con_carne Dec 9, 08:44
- It used to be, but now I think they claim that god created evolution. nm - Dignan Dec 9, 08:43 8
  - Nothing new about that. -- nm - mara Dec 9, 08:44 7
    - see: Teilhard de Chardin. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:48
    - Is this part of accepted established religious dogma though? Or something that individuals accept so their belief and faith don't directly contradict? - musubi Dec 9, 08:47 5
      - depends on the religion. The Catholic Church has no official dogma regarding evolution. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:47 4
        
        Seriously? Why not? nm - Dignan Dec 9, 08:48 3
        
        because they learned their lesson from past fiascos like Copernicus. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:50 2
        
        Isn't that the same as admitting that they're full of crap? - Dignan Dec 9, 08:53 1
        
        they're admitting they were wrong. that's a good thing. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 08:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.