ST Alpha - "Again, not mutually exclusive. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "Man whore update; "Tiger was spinning the tales on his Web site and posting them on Facebook in response to questions from fans."" by Loyola

Again, not mutually exclusive. -- nm

Posted by TFox Dec 9 '09, 10:10

(No message)

Responses:

Yeah. I think the story has almost gone full circle where I'm starting to feel sorry for Tiger again. - musubi Dec 9, 10:12 9
- I don't really feel bad for him. He earned it. But something that is assuredly very complex is getting oversimplified constantly. - TFox Dec 9, 10:14 8
  - Yeah, that's why I said almost. (nm) - musubi Dec 9, 10:17 6
    - word. i agree that we agree. -- nm - TFox Dec 9, 10:19 5
      - Now I'm not sure. Perhaps we could get znuffri's input on whether we agree or not? (nm) - musubi Dec 9, 10:21 4
        
        If he could first define "agree". In the modern context, of course. Older cultures may not "agree" in the same manner as our present construct. -- nm - TFox Dec 9, 10:22 3
        
        Is that 'big A' or 'little a' agree? -- nm - Agent.Vermin Dec 9, 10:27 2
        
        It's counter-clockwise. -- nm - Beryllium Dec 9, 10:33 1
        
        From the north pole, or the south? (nm) - musubi Dec 9, 10:34
  - Rice-A-Roni really is the San Francisco treat. It can't be more simple. -- nm - adventy97 Dec 9, 10:15
obviously he isn't. -- nm - adventy97 Dec 9, 10:11

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.