ST Alpha - "The point being: it *wouldn't* prevent mandy from seeing them though." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 166

In response to "If it keeps amanda from seeing posts about extra-marital sex, then my job is done. It was all worth it. -- nm" by Mop (229 lbs)

The point being: it wouldn't prevent mandy from seeing them though.

Posted by musubi Dec 9 '09, 16:17

she'd have to tag them herself, for her filtering to be of any consequence, right?

and then at the end of the day, is this really doing anything that a simple boolean can't do?

Responses:

I'm confused. When I tag a post NSFW, doesn't it show up NSFW for everyone? -- nm - Mop (229 lbs) Dec 9, 16:19 10
- So you want to tag and define not your ST, but my ST too? nubby please. just stop. -- nm - TFox Dec 9, 16:21 9
  - pssst. that's not nubby. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 16:24 2
    - pssst. expression. -- nm - TFox Dec 9, 16:25 1
      - that needs a tag. -- nm - loosilu Dec 9, 16:27
  - Who tagged my post about a car crash as NSFW earlier this week? It wasn't me. -- nm - Mop (229 lbs) Dec 9, 16:21 5
    - So if I search for say "Joke" tags, I get every post that *anyone* tagged as a joke? - musubi Dec 9, 16:25
    - yes, but see, NSFW has a purpose. #green, #February, and #ballsack does not. -- nm - TFox Dec 9, 16:23 2
      - Note to Bery: Please don't include #green, #February, and #ballsack as pre-defined tags. -- nm - Mop (229 lbs) Dec 9, 16:24 1
        
        I don't know. #ballsack would probably be pretty useful. nm - ralph wiggum Dec 9, 16:40
    - It was ME! *closes elevator door* -- nm - Beryllium Dec 9, 16:22

Post a message top

The point being: it *wouldn't* prevent mandy from seeing them though.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.

The point being: it wouldn't prevent mandy from seeing them though.