Backboards: 
Posts: 159

Here's my opinion on the bank bailouts: It had to be done to stabilize the economy. If these "too big to fail" institutions had failed we'd be in

another depression.

IF they had been dismantled or new regs had been put in place at the same time, the recovery would have been stunted or negated because the banks would have gone into "zero risk" mode while they figured out how to play under the new rules.

Better that new regs come a year from now after things are stabilized. When futzing with the rules and looking at separating banks into components won't exacerbate an already twitchy economy.

If those regs and dismantlings DON'T happen, I'll be pretty damn pissed. But right now I think what needed to be done has been done.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.