Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 159
In response to
"
The bank bailouts didn't stabilize the economy, they stabilized the banks. And for months after the banks were stabilized, the economy was still
"
by
Loyola
And where do you think the economy would be if the banking system went belly up? Getting the banks staqble allows the economy to stabilize.
Posted by
TWuG
Dec 14 '09, 09:11
And unemployment has always been a lagging indicator.
Responses:
Well let's ignore for a second many of the investment banks had to actually register to become "bank holding companies" so as to receive TARP funds.
-
Loyola
Dec 14, 09:17
That would have been a good opportunity to create a nationalized bank -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 14, 09:13
3
Horrible idea. -- nm
-
TWuG
Dec 14, 09:15
2
Please explain how this would be so very different from, say, repeatedly bailing out private banks with strings attached -- nm
-
con_carne
Dec 14, 09:18
1
You're assuming repetition. I'm assuming better regulation in the future to prevent a repeat. -- nm
-
TWuG
Dec 14, 09:30
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.