I don�t understand how science and religion became antonyms. -- nm
Posted by
adventy97 (aka ty97)
Dec 16 '09, 10:39
|
(No message)
|
Responses:
-
Just as a point of note, because I don't want to be lumped in with the "religion can do no good" folks, my B2 post
-
TWuG
Dec 16, 10:56
2
-
Probably because, on the surface, it seems like they're approaching the same problem from diametrically opposite angles.
-
Beryllium
Dec 16, 10:48
-
I don't think they're antonyms, but they are certainly different ideas that share many similarities. -- nm
-
JaxSean
Dec 16, 10:44
-
i don't think they *have* to be. but when certain small, but vocal, religions object to teaching evolution, etc, it colours how people see the
-
Andie Cane
Dec 16, 10:43
3
- [deleted]
2
-
You and Dan Brown. (nm)
-
David
Dec 16, 10:43
-
the understanding can probably be found from reading Aquinas or some such. -- nm
-
Max
Dec 16, 10:42
-
I have never thought of them as such. -- nm
-
Let it Spawn, let it Spawn, let it Spawn!
Dec 16, 10:42
- [deleted]
16
-
Safe sex. -- nm
-
Let it Spawn, let it Spawn, let it Spawn!
Dec 16, 10:44
15
-
I don't get the mutually-exclusive thing myself. -- nm
-
b.festive.
Dec 16, 10:42
-
Because sciences is explaining every mystery that religion chalked up to a supreme being?
-
Cuzzin Todd
Dec 16, 10:41
-
cause one is about faith and the other is about testing observable things -- nm
-
mr. squiggles at 30,000 feet
Dec 16, 10:41
-
Grr. -- nm
-
zombie Galileo
Dec 16, 10:41
-
because they each focus on two diametrically opposed realities?
-
znufrii
Dec 16, 10:40
5
|
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
|
|